TissueSeg:itkEMS Reliability
Results for the itkEMS Reliability study
The Lilly "10" QC dataset of the same subject was segmented with itkEMS. Three dual-channel segmentation trials were performed to compare the segmentation reliability using different versions of itkEMS:
- itkEMS 1.5.4 performing an atlas-to-case affine registration then bias-field correction
- itkEMS 1.7: performing an atlas-to-case deformable registration then bias-field correction
- itkEMS 1.8: performing a bias-field correction then atlas-to-case deformable registration
Parameters are not equal but have been set the same way they are applied in our studies:
- itkEMS 1.5:
- Filter iterations: 10 - Filter Time step: 0.01 - Filter method: Grad aniso diffusion - Max bias degree: 3 - Prior 1: 1.3 - Prior 2: 1 - Prior 3: 0.7 - Prior 4: 1
- itkEMS 1.7 & itkEMS 1.8:
- Filter iterations: 6 - Filter Time step: 0.01 - Filter method: Curvature flow - Max bias degree: 4 - Prior 1: 1.3 - Prior 2: 1 - Prior 3: 0.7 - Prior 4: 1 - Atlas warp: 1 - Atlas warp grid X: 5 - Atlas warp grid Y: 5 - Atlas warp grid Z: 5
The covariance was computed in each trial, not only for each tissue (White matter, grey matter and CSF), but also for the Intra Cranial Volume, sum of the three tissues.
- Covariance/Tissue WM GM CSF ICV - itkEMS1.5 1.20% 1.03% 6.26% 0.96% - itkEMS1.7 2.89% 1.32% 3.68% 0.46% - itkEMS1.8 1.82% 0.89% 4.30% 0.81%
In this study, itkEMS1.7 seems to be the most reliable version concerning the ICV, even if the results differ for each tissue. As the input images don't need a strong bias field correction, we do not seee itkEMS1.8 method's improvement compared to itkEMS1.7.
See data detailed on spreadsheet:
Media:LQC_itkEMSReliabilityStudy_VolumeAnalysis.xls
For each itkEMS version and each tissue, an average T1-weighted label image has been computed. Then, using the 'EvaluateSegmentationResult' tool, volume differences, average differences and tanimoto errors have been computed between each case and the previously computed average .
See data detailed on spreadsheet:
Media:LQC_itkEMS_SegmentationEvaluation.xls
cvachet@email.unc.edu